Run for the Cure? There’s no way.

Susan G. Komen for the Cure may have abandoned and attempted to wash its hands of its politically motivated decision to cut life-saving funds to Planned Parenthood, but issues brought to light by that debacle have not been solved.

Virulently anti-choice activist, Jane Abraham, continues to sit on their board. As it states on her mini-bio on Komen website, she is “the General Chairman of the Susan B. Anthony List, a not-for-profit membership organization and connected Political Action Committee.” The Susan B. Anthony List’s agenda includes defunding Planned Parenthood, enacting extreme “rape-audit” bills, and rolling back President Obama’s no-cost birth-control policy. The fact that Komen continues to have such an extremist on its board should give pause to any progressive considering participation in the organization.

Throwing pink with “for the cure” on unhealthy products does nothing to help cure breast cancer. There’s a word for this, pinkwashing:

Pinkwasher: (pink’-wah-sher) noun. A company or organization that claims to care about breast cancer by promoting a pink ribbon product, but at the same time produces, manufactures and/or sells products that are linked to the disease.

Komen is the biggest culprit when it comes to pinkwashing. Think pink KFC buckets.

These aren’t the only area where Komen continues to fall short: Komen continues to fund outdated animal tests. As explained by Ingrid Newkirk, president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Komen “does women a disservice by continuing to channel funds into animal tests, while other cancer charities have moved on from such old-fashioned abominations or never engaged in them to begin with.” Animals tests are archaic, unethical, ineffective and, quite frankly, useless to modern science. There is no reason for Komen to continue to fund them.

Through its actions regarding Planned Parenthood earlier this year, Komen has inadvertently exposed itself as the right-wing organization hiding behind a “pink ribbon” cover.

Instead of running for the cure, considering making an impact against breast cancer in other, more effective and direct ways. Consider supporting another organization like Planned Parenthood, the American Breast Cancer Foundation, Feel Your Boobies Foundation, and other organizations which fight against breast cancer without ugly right-wing undertones.

PUC Mall

360 panorama view of the PUC campus mall

The Purity Myth: At A Glance

I read Jessica Valenti’s The Purity Myth a few months ago, I just ran across some notes/observations I had written while reading and decided post them:

  • There is no working medical definition for “virginity” and no medical dictionary includes the word — the designation is entirely a societal fabrication which does not even have a consistent definition.
  • “Vaginal rejuvenation,” a form of plastic surgery in which a woman’s labia is trimmed and her vagina tightened, or her hymen is completely replaced (a “revirginization”) is the fastest growing form of plastic surgery in the United States.
  • Over 1,400 federally funded Purity Balls, where young girls pledge their virginity to their fathers in a promlike event, were held in 2006 across the United States — taxpayer dollars at work.
  • Only violence against white women is going down. The incidents of intimate partner violence among black females increased from 3.8 to 6.6 victimizations per 1,000 women between 2003 and 2004. And the average annual rate of intimate partner violence from 1993 to 2004 was highest for American Indian and Alaskan Native women—18.2 victimizations per 1,000 women.
  • A 2007 report from the American Psychological Association found that nearly every form of media studied provided “ample evidence of the sexualization of women,” and that most of that sexualization focused on young women.
  • “Over 80 percent of abstinence programs contain false or misleading information about sex and reproductive health, including retro gender stereotypes like: ‘A woman is far more attracted by a man’s personality while a man is stimulated by sight. A man is usually less discriminating about those to whom he is physically attracted.’”
  • Abstinence-only education programs have received over $1.3 billion from the federal government since 1996 despite not mentioning contraception except to talk about bogus failure rates. Meanwhile, 82 percent of Americans support programs that teach students about different forms of contraception.
  • Students who take virginity pledges are more likely to have oral and anal sex.
  • Between 1995 and 2007, states enacted 557 anti-choice measures—43 in 2007 alone. Since President George W. Bush took office, state legislatures have considered more than 3700 anti-choice measures in total.
  • “FDA approval for Plan B, the morning after pill that prevents pregnancy, was held up after a FDA medical official wrote in an internal memo that over-the-counter status could cause ‘extreme promiscuous behaviors such as the medication taking on an ‘urban legend’ status that would lead adolescents to form sex-based cults centered around the use of Plan B.’”
  • More and more laws are cropping up that attempt to curb pregnant women’s rights, and even punish them. In 2004, a Utah woman was charged with murder after refusing to have a cesarean section and one of her twin babies was delivered stillborn. One legislator in Virginia even introduced a bill in 2005 that would make it a crime—one punishable by a year in jail—for a woman not to report her miscarriage to the police within 12 hours. It’s only gotten worse since the book was published.

I thought the book was a worthwhile read. It includes many harrowing statistics and facts (from my perspective) about the state of our society and the need for further progress on women’s issues. The book is particularly puissant now in view of the Republican War on Women—pursuing an end to Planned Parenthood, opposing the Violence Against Women Act and supporting overturning the right to choose.

Iowa Caucus Result

Congratulations, Santorum.